Which conflict management strategy is both cooperative and adversarial?

The conflict management strategy known as compromising is characterized by elements of both cooperation and adversarial interactions. In this approach, each party involved agrees to give up something in order to reach an agreement. This means that while there is a collaborative element—since both parties are working together to find a middle ground—there is also an adversarial aspect, as each party is pushing for their own interests and concessions.

Compromising is particularly effective when time is a factor and a quick resolution is needed, as it allows both sides to feel like they have gained something while still addressing the conflict. This strategy acknowledges the differing interests and positions of each party, thereby aiming to create a solution that is acceptable to both, though it may not fully satisfy either party’s original demands.

In contrast, other strategies such as collaborating focus solely on cooperative efforts to achieve a win-win outcome, while avoiding does not address the conflict at all. Leading is more about guiding others and doesn't directly relate to conflict management in the same cooperative-adversarial sense as compromising does.